Since COVID-19 people's rights and liberties are being curtailed on a massive scale by the power elite. COVID-19 was from its beginning a highly politicized topic, and highly politicized topics are highly suspicious. All over the world politicians and media focused completely on COVID-19 as if there was no other news in the world. Only COVID-19 mattered and hospitals were cleared for COVID-19 patients.** The flu that raged around the world every year since the beginning of mankind suddenly seemed to have disappeared because every sickness and death was labeled "COVID", despite the fact that one cannot tell the difference between flu and COVID-19 because they have the same signs and symptoms.** There was much exaggeration and misrepresentation of facts to make things seem worse than they were, and the ignorant sheeple fell for the trap. Nobody talked about the disastrous consequences of the global lockdowns imposed by the power elite, causing the destruction of the world economy and misery for countless people in the low to middle income class, while the elite who own the major industries made huge profits.** Never waste a good crisis...

For measuring the severeness of a virus we can use the case fatality rate (CFR = deaths/cases) or the infection fatality rate (IFR = deaths/infections). The number of infections is logically higher than the number of cases because not all people with an infection got tested, most people only had mild symptoms or were asymptomatic.** Already in March 2020 it was reported that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza** which has a CFR of approximately 0.1%. Early in 2020 the overall CFR in China was estimated at 0.5%.** In December 2020 the hospital CFR in France was 0.174%.** The CFR peaks during the first wave and then declines after natural immunity and other factors start slowing the virus.**

Dutch Central Agency for Statistics (CBS) publishes total deaths per year in the Netherlands. Numbers published in April 2022** show that the total death count of 2020 is higher than that of 2019, but this is expected during a bad flu season. In 2020 and 2021 there were many deaths caused by the lockdowns. Interestingly, the death count of 2021, the year of mass vaccinations, is higher than that of 2020, the year of the so-called "killer virus". WHO statistics confirm this.**** In May 2022 billionaire Bill Gates, who made fortunes of computer viruses, and more recently of biological viruses after grossly exaggerating their CFR, said: We didn't really understand the fatality rate, you know, we didn't understand that it's a fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly the elderly, kind of like flu is, although a bit different than that.** It was like a bad flu.

Somewhere in 2010 the WHO changed the definition of "pandemic"** to exclude the phrase enormous numbers of deaths and illness.*** On top of that a second change was made to drop the requirement for a new sub-type with a simple reassortant virus meaning that many seasonal flu viruses could be classified as pandemic influenza.** Since 2010 the yearly flu outbreak can even be called a "pandemic".

Camille Maringe et al - The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK...
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic for example cancer screening has been suspended, routine diagnostic work deferred, and only urgent symptomatic cases were prioritised for diagnostic intervention and that there were substantial increases in the number of avoidable cancer deaths to be expected as a result of diagnostic delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Excess death is for example caused by people not seeking emergency hospital treatment for a heart attack or other acute cardiovascular illness requiring urgent medical attention, either because they were afraid of contracting COVID-19 or were not referred for treatment.** Excess deaths also includes people who died due to for example increased unemployment and reduced public-sector expenditure on health care. In England and Wales alone there were 2,085 excess cardiovascular deaths from March 2 to June 30, an increase of 8%.** As a comparison, the lesser financial crisis of 2008 had an estimated excess cancer-related death rate of 260,000 for the OECD countries* because unemployment and reduced public-sector expenditure on healthcare are significantly associated with cancer mortality. And that's only "cancer-related" excess death, and only "for the rich OECD countries". See also Planet Lockdown.

Smriti Mallapaty - The coronavirus is most deadly if you are older and male
For every 1,000 people infected with the coronavirus who are under the age of 50, almost none will die. For people in their fifties and early sixties, about five will die — more men than women. The risk then climbs steeply as the years accrue. For every 1,000 people in their mid-seventies or older who are infected, around 116 will die. These are the stark statistics obtained by some of the first detailed studies into the mortality risk for COVID-19. *

In the UK the average age of COVID-19 deaths is 81 years for men and 85 years for women.** That's the age at which most people are already dying. The life expectancy in the UK for men is around 80 years and for women around 83 years.**

Gianfranco Alicandro et al - Italy's first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic has ended...
In Italy... the median age at death of patients who died and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection was 82 years; 95% of them had at least one comorbidity, and 60% had at least three comorbidities before being infected. ...a large number of patients who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 might have died in May of other causes, although their deaths were attributed to COVID-19. *

Like with any other influenza or corona virus, COVID-19 affects almost only old and vulnerable people, often with comorbidities like cancer, cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, etcetera. Many deaths due to comorbidities were labeled COVID-19 deaths which artificially kept the death rate higher than it really is. The CDC mentioned: For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.9 additional conditions or causes per death.** The CDC also reported: About 78% of people who have been hospitalized, needed a ventilator or died from Covid-19 have been overweight or obese.** Lots of people are already compromised concerning health before catching COVID.** If at all there's a pandemic, it's a pandemic of irresponsible unhealthy people. The healthy are close to not affected and only experience mild symptoms.**

Debra Malina et al - The Corporatization of U.S. Health Care, A New Perspective Series
The trends toward corporate ownership of health care organizations, market consolidation and concentration, and emphasis on the bottom line are widely seen as primarily benefiting corporate executives and their shareholders. Clinicians are becoming increasingly demoralized and are either seeking viable ways out of a system that they feel treats them as cogs in a wheel. *

Many hospitals in the United States are run like businesses** and they are plagued by ethical issues.** Since 2020 they fall under the CARES Act which states in Section 3710: In the case of a discharge of an individual diagnosed with COVID-19, the Secretary shall increase the weighting factor that would otherwise apply to the diagnosis-related group to which the discharge is assigned by 20 percent.* So for each in-hospital death of Medicare patients and those without health insurance the hospital receives extra money if it's "related to COVID-19". Then it's not hard to imagine that this also keeps the number high for "COVID-19 related" deaths in the US where practically everything is based on some return on investment or business model, including for-profit hospitals. In the last decades hospitals have become for-profit institutions** with obvious consequences, despite the misinformation spread by government- and industry-funded universities and state media that try to make you believe otherwise. See for example US News article When Nonprofit Hospitals Become For-Profit, Patients Fare No Worse.** It reminds of the time when governments and their physicians and media tried to make the world believe that smoking didn't cause lung cancer.

In 2005 epidemiologist and professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London, aka "professor lockdown",** said that up to 200 million people could be killed from bird flu.** Dead wrong. Only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009.** In 2009, Ferguson and his Imperial team predicted that swine flu would have a mortality rate around 0.4%. Dead wrong again. In the end swine flu killed 457 people in the UK and had a death rate of only 0.026% in those infected. Worldwide it only had an infection fatality rate of about 0.01–0.03%,* comparable to an extremely light flu. In 2020 the same "professor" predicted approximately 510,000 deaths in Great Britain and 2.2 million in the US within three months in an unmitigated epidemic, not accounting for the potential negative effects of health systems being overwhelmed.* On 25 December 2020, almost one year after outbreak, Great Britain had 70,195 deaths and the US 337,927 deaths.** And these numbers are highly inflated because of for example comorbidities and compromised health. Neil Ferguson is linked to the WHO, the CDC, the EU, the UK, and the US.** Universities like Imperial College London are sponsored millions by the Gates Foundation** which of course have some kind of return on investment. Could it be that the power elite in control of these powerful organizations make use of these kind of universities and professors to exaggerate numbers which they can then conveniently use to further their agenda?

source

This clown was the Prime Minister of the UK making use of fear politics. The political elite are heavily involved in extremely politicized topics because they have to sell the inhumane measures of the power elite above them to the ignorant public. Governments around the world were quick to implement harsch measures based on tweakable computer models** produced by the universities and professors sponsored by themselves. In May 2020 "professor" Neil Ferguson quit as a government adviser on COVID-19, after a woman he was said to be in a relationship with visited his home in lockdown, during strict Corona measures.** In the same news article UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock said it was "extraordinary" and that he "took the right decision to resign" and that the social distancing rules "are there for everyone" and are "deadly serious". In June 2021 Matt Hancock himself quit as health secretary after being photographed passionately kissing his extramarital lover during strict social distancing rules.** Absolutely hilarious.

source

For example, Belgian Minister of Health from 2014 to 2020, Maggie de Block, a "shining example of health" herself, was caught picking her nose in an online Teams meeting while it was forbidden to pick one's nose due to COVID-19 rules as mandated by herself. What a joke. The political elite deceived the nations while the utterly ignorant and fearful sheeple blindly followed their orders without any question...

source

See also FDA.

The Rockefeller Foundation is a think tank of the ultra-rich. It aims to boost Covid-19 vaccination rates and counter public health mis- and disinformation** because its ultra-rich owners make huge profits from this multi-billion dollar business. In May 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation published a document called Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development * in which they "coincidentally" described exactly what would happen during the COVID-19 crisis ten years later. In the chapter called LOCK STEP: A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback they present us with a doom scenario...

Rockefeller Foundation - Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. ... international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. ... The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery. ... During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. ... leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power. ... Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. ... Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money. *

A scenario exactly like the COVID-19 crisis. What a coincidence. In 2016 Peter Daszak, a member of the WHO, made the following statement...

Peter Daszak - Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases...
Until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs [Medical Countermeasures] such as a pan-influenza or pancoronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process. *

In September 2019 a paper called A World at Risk was released stating...

GPMB 2019 Annual Report - A World at Risk
There is a very real threat of a rapidly moving, highly lethal pandemic of a respiratory pathogen killing 50 to 80 million people and wiping out nearly 5% of the world’s economy. A global pandemic on that scale would be catastrophic, creating widespread havoc, instability and insecurity. The world is not prepared. *

An emergency would help the power elite to create public support for their vaccines. Prophetic statements to prepare the public for looming disaster by which the power elite would give themselves more control and to boost their multi-billion dollar business. Never waste a good crisis. On 18 October 2019, shortly before the outbreak of COVID-19, the John Hopkins Center for Health Security partnered with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to host the tabletop exercise Event 201 in New York City...

John Hopkins Center for Health Security - Event 201
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences. ... Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global—a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A severe pandemic, which becomes “Event 201,” would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions. **

This was a simulation of a global virus outbreak with disastrous consequences set up by the power elite in order to promote global cooperation under their guidance. According to themselves Event 201 aimed to educate senior leaders at the highest level of US and international governments and leaders in global industries.** The power elite rehearsed their global power grab. From 28 to 30 October 2019 there was a Future of Health Summit ** at the Milken Institute, another so-called think tank sponsored by the power elite by which they influence world events. At this meeting they were talking about a universal flu vaccine, and mRNA vaccines which at that time still was a technology never used on humans. Here are some quotes...


Citizen Ascendant - Discussing Universal Flu Vaccine at the Future of Health Summit in October 2019
Why don't we blow the system up? I mean, obviously we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have, and then say 'hey, everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven't given to anyone yet', but there must be some way... There might be a need or even an urgent call for an entity of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes. ... It's not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere. ... So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza and it's gonna be very difficult to change that, unless you do it from within and say 'I don't care what your perception is, we're gonna address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way.

And lo and behold, only two months later COVID-19 broke out and the world changed dramatically in favor of these power elite. What a coincidence.

source

In January 2021, Marion Koopmans, also linked to the WHO, responded after the interviewer mentioned that her work implied that the chance for a second pandemic is very high: Yes, there is consensus about this. It was already mentioned for a while in the 10 year plan of the World Health Organization.*** This interview also features in the video above. See Agenda 2030.