Militarism is the belief or the desire of a government or a people that a state should maintain a strong military capability and to use it aggressively to expand national interests and/or values. ... Militarism has been a significant element of the imperialist or expansionist ideologies of many nations throughout history.* Already in 1935 it was reported in Fortune magazine...

Fortune magazine - Quoted from C. Wright Mills' The Power Elite
It is generally supposed that the American military ideal is peace. But for this high-school classic, the U.S. Army, since 1776, has filched more square miles of the earth by sheer military conquest than any army in the world, except only that of Great Britain. And as between Great Britain and the U.S. it has been a close race, Britain having conquered something over 3,500,000 square miles (9 million square km) since that date, and the U.S. (if one includes wresting the Louisiana Purchase from the Indians) something over 3,100,000. The English-speaking people have done themselves proud in this regard.

Since then the Anglo-American Empire has expanded exponentially...



Christopher J. Fettweis - Revisiting Mackinder and Angell: The Obsolescence of Great Power Geopolitics
... the major powers have also historically been the most war-prone of states. Traditionally, not just military capability but actual bellicosity has become part of the very definition of great power status. Historically speaking, the most powerful state in the system by various empirical measures also is the one that experiences the most conflict.

Force is used for one's own interest. In the famous book The Art of War Sun Tzu wrote: It is the rule in war, if ten times the enemy's strength, surround them; if five times, attack them; if double, be able to divide them; if equal, engage them; if fewer, defend against them; if weaker, be able to avoid them.* This is common sense war logic that is valid at all times. The Anglo-American Empire is the most militarized empire ever and it has been expanding systematically with each war. In the last decades it has been encircling Russia and China in order to eventually destroy them and take over their resources and power as it has done with many lesser powerful nations since World War II. It's common sense that stronger nations use their military power to attack weaker nations and expand their power while weaker nations use their military power to defend against attacking nations. In 2007 retired general of the U.S. Army Wesley Clark said that, from the perspective of the United States, the purpose of the military is to start wars and change governments, it's not to deter conflict.* Hence the many aggressive wars led by the United States since World War II.



source

Zoltán Grossman - War and New US Military Bases
Since 1990, each large-scale U.S. intervention has left behind a string of new U.S. military bases in a region where the U.S. had never before had a foothold. The U.S. military is inserting itself into strategic areas of the world, and anchoring U.S. geopolitical influence in these areas, at a very critical time in history. It has been projecting that military dominance into new strategic regions as a future counterweight to its economic competitors, to create a military-backed "dollar bloc" as a wedge geographically situated between its major competitors (Euro, Yen)... The goal is not to end "terror" or encourage "democracy," and Bush will not accomplish either of these claimed goals. The short-term goal is to station U.S. military forces in regions where local nationalists had evicted them. The long-term goal is to increase U.S. corporate control over the oil needed by Europe and East Asia. *

The Anglo-American Empire is by far the most militarized empire ever. In 2015 the military of the United States was deployed in 147 countries around the world while there are in total 195 countries in the world. Especially since World War II the United States has intentionally expanded its military bases around the world. Military expansion serves economic objectives. It's all part of American imperialism. See also NATO Imperialism and New Cold War.

Smedley D. Butler - War is a Racket
War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small 'inside' group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

Wars are about power and they are fought for economic and financial reasons. After World War I Woodrow Wilson speeched: Is there any man here or any woman, let me say is there any child here, who does not know that the seed of war in the modern world is industrial and commercial rivalry?* The power elite in control of banks profit from wars by printing incredible amounts of fiat money. The debt then rests on the shoulders of common taxpayers who are forced to repay this debt with interest in the future. War profiteers often sell their war material to both sides of the conflict. For example the Rothschild family financed both sides of the Napoleonic Wars, the BIS bank and its western banking allies financed both sides during World War II, and the West supported both Iran and Iraq when they were at war. Wars mean business for the power elite in control of the military industry.



Anders Akerman, Anna Larsson Seim - The Global Arms Trade Network 1950-2007
The arms trade is surrounded by great controversy. The nature of arms and the possibility to hold governments accountable for irresponsible trades makes the issue politically charged. In recent years, the propensity of many democratic governments to sell arms to autocracies and human-rights violators has stirred great public discontent.

The arms industry profits from the sale of its weapons, it benefits from wars and violence around the world. The military-industrial complex is big business. The fact that military activities may become a profitable enterprise leads to the realization that peace is the main enemy of the military-industrial complex. In 2007 US president George W. Bush said: Money trumps peace... commercial interests are very powerful interests throughout the world.*** Already in 1956 Mills wrote...

C. Wright Mills - The Power Elite
For the first time in American history, men in authority are talking about an 'emergency' without foreseeable end. ... The only seriously accepted plan for 'peace' is the fully loaded pistol. In short, war or a high state of war preparedness is felt to be the normal and seemingly permanent condition of the United States.

If war means business then permanent war means permanent business. World War II was followed by the Cold War which evolved into the New Cold War. In 2017 SIPRI reported that World military expenditure is estimated to have reached $1739 billion in 2017, the highest level since the end of the cold war. All money spent on warfare is not spent on wellfare.